|
But What About the Guy Who Sued for $54 Million For His Lost Pants?
by Tom Hudson
The case of
attorney Roy Pearson, who sued his dry cleaner for $54 million over some
missing pants is over, and the court did the right thing, bouncing the case
at the first opportunity. Interestingly, it has only taken a few days
for the forces of Corporate America to begin using the case of the $54
million pants to bolster their case for cutting off the rights of the
injured.
It is undeniable
that the pants lawsuit was an abuse of the system. It's a shame that
the case ever got filed. But is it an argument for tort reform?
The judge in the
case has deferred ruling on the dry cleaner’s motion that Pearson pay their
lawyers' fees. If she grants that motion (and she should) the system
will have worked exactly as it is supposed to work. In frivolous
lawsuits, it has always been within the judge's power to make the offending
plaintiff pay for the trouble he caused. However, the possibility of a
frivolous lawsuit is no more a reason to restrict lawsuits than the O.J.
Simpson case is a reason to rid the country of kitchen cutlery.
Lawsuits serve
several important functions. In the free enterprise system, it is
critical that all businesses pay their own way. If a business leaves a
trail of injured people in its wake, and those people go uncompensated, then
the business is freeloading on those people no less than if it failed to pay
its rent. That freeloading business can then set its prices lower,
gaining a competitive advantage from being subsidized by the uncompensated
victims.
A related, but separate, benefit of
lawsuits is that they change the risk/profit calculation of businesses.
Here's an example that you probably never thought of. Remember when
lawsuits against McDonalds were ridiculed as frivolous? At
the time, you couldn't get a healthy meal at the world's largest restaurant
chain. Have you been to McDonalds lately? There are at least
three kinds of salads available, as well as fruit and yogurt and other
healthy food. It was a simple case of calculation of risk and benefit. The
winner was the American people.
The
threat of lawsuits has improved our lives in many ways, including
flame-retardant night clothing, seat belts, and trucks that go
"beep-beep-beep" when they back up. The people who weren't
injured because of those innovations do not even know that they were
beneficiaries of our legal system.
The
next time you see an editorial opposing "frivolous" lawsuits, take note.
They never quote the statistics, because the statistics show that the number
of tort lawsuits has been steadily declining for about twenty years.
You can easily look up these numbers by going to the
National Center for State Courts, (http://www.ncsconline.org) a
nonpartisan organization which keeps detailed statistics of the usage of
America's court system.
It is a marvel of
propaganda that the insurance companies and big business have succeeded in
turning the minds of working-class Americans against the system which will
provide for their families if they are hurt or killed by negligence or
defective products. The good news is that a growing number of
Americans now realize that they have been victims of a con job. The
bad news is that they usually learn only after they or a loved one is
seriously injured, and the wrongdoer walks away, laughing all the way to the
bank.
Thomas S. Hudson, Attorney
|
 |
|
|